Contrary to the earlier decision in InnovatorOne, the High Court has held in Orchard v Dhillon [2025] EWHC 834 (Ch) that a right to recover property under s.26 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 may be enforceable against a successor in title to the party who had infringed that Act’s “general prohibition".
Christopher Cooke and Nicholas Davidson KC have provided a case note on this matter, please see below to view full note.
Simon Howarth KC successfully represented the appellant.
